

With clear skies virtually throughout the country the first of the competitors arrived at Margate as early as Thursday afternoon. Friday morning we looked set for yet another cloudless day and the official route was released at 08h00. The rest of the competitors arrived during the course of the day, the last registration being at 16h30.
Everybody proceeded to San Lameer where the sponsors BMW (S.A.), hosted a cocktail party and a warm welcome was extended to all by Mr. John Jessup (member of the Management Board - Marketing) of BMW (S.A.).
Pre-race briefing was held early on Saturday morning and already there were signs of low cloud drifting up from the south. By 08h30 the skies could no longer bear their load and we were treated to some of the heaviest winter rains seen in years. The first leg was postponed till Sunday and while some competitors returned to their rooms to prepare the alternate route, others ventured to the gambling dens of the Wild Coast Casino.
Sunday morning we were greeted by warm and cloudless skies and the Lear 25d was first off on the route to Underberg - Ladysmith - Weenen and then back to Margate - taking only 38 minutes to complete this course. Next off was the Cessna Citation 11, also requiring only 50 minutes to complete the course. The rest of the field followed at 10h30 at one-minute intervals after both jets had returned safely.
The first feedback came from our Marshal at Ladysmith, Des Tarboton, who overheard the following conversation between Durban AIC and an S.A.A. Airbus - "We're overhead Ladysmith at a groundspeed of 460 kt and we have an unidentified light aircraft below us, that is out accelerating us".
The whole field returned safely with only four competitors missing the turning point at Underberg. As one of the competitors was unable to depart from Lanseria on Saturday morning due to weather, he only arrived after the start of the race and was then sent round the course with a video camera. The video recording was superb and undoubtedly confirmed his flight to all the checkpoints.
The two jets were again sent off first on Monday proceeding to Magwa Tea Estates, then on to Barkley East, Kokstad and then back to Margate. The rest of the field was started at 10h25 with the first aircraft off being the Cessna 170. Drama struck when the Beechcraft Sundowner developed engine trouble shortly after take off and was forced to return to Margate whilst the start was still in progress. Unfortunately, two of the Bonanzas were delayed by one minute whilst the Sundowner returned to land.
First across the line was the Beechcraft Baron of last year's winners, John Sayers and Chris Kyle, followed also by previous winners Peter Walker and Marius Els in their Beechcraft Baron. The rest of the field followed shortly afterwards with the last aircraft returning at 13h45.
A special mention should be made of the one overseas entry - a Beech 23 G-BDYL piloted by T. Rose (U.K.) and navigator E. de Villiers (S.A.). More overseas entries should he encouraged.
The prize-giving banquet was held in a marquee at San Lameer, magnificently decorated in an aviation theme by BMW (S.A.). Unfortunately, the Natal Mercury Trophy for the First National Pilot was erroneously awarded. After reconciliation, the trophy was awarded to Chris Proctor and Andrew Campbell of Pietermaritzburg.
On behalf of the organisers, I'd like to express my thanks to the following people: BMW (S.A.), Gill Kaiser, Peter Wood, Graeme Conlyn, Margate Municipality, Refuellers, Air Traffic Control, André Steyn, Sue MeGlashan, Schwartz Jewellers, National Airways Corporation, all the Marshalls, Time Keepers, Airport Management, Department of Civil Aviation, San Lameer staff, Handicapping Committee and Aero Club of South Africa, all the competitors for another safe, incident-free race.
| Pos | Race No |
Reg | Aircraft | HP | H/Cap Knots |
Gain(-) Loss |
Speed Knots |
Pilot Navigator |
Province Club |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | 7 | ZS-MTD | Lear 25D | R Schwarts/A Potgieter G Pretoruis |
Tvl | ||||
| 02 | 49 | Beech B55 | John Sayers Chris Kyle |
Tvl Krugersdorp |
|||||
| 03 | 37 | Beech B58 | Peter Walker Marius Els |
| Trophy Name | Awarded to | Race | A/c Reg | Pilot/Navigator Aircraft |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| State President's Trophy | The Competitor gaining most time on Handicap | 7 | R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius Lear 25d |
|
| Air Charter Trophy | The Second Pilot Home | 49 | John Sayers/Chris Kyle Beech B55 |
|
| Vincent Maclean Trophy | The Third Pilot Home | 37 | Peter Walker/Maruis Els Beech 58 |
|
| Natal Advertiser Trophy | The Competitor covering the course in the fastest time | 7 | R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius Lear 25d |
|
| Vickers Trophy | The Competitor giving the Most Meritorious Performance | 7 | R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius Lear 25d |
|
| Wakefield Trophy | The First Woman Pilot Home | 43 | Maureen Forrester/Aloma Stevens Beech 36 |
|
| Natal Mercury Trophy | The First Kwa Zulu Natal Pilot Home | 28 | C J B Proctor/A Campbell Piper PA28-180 |
|
| Hoofstad Pers Trophy | The First Transvaal Pilot Home | 7 | R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius Lear 25d |
|
| Northern Review Trophy | The First Northern Transvaal Pilot Home | 20 | H Steyn/A G Steyn Cessna C172 XP |
|
| Phoenix Volkswagen Trophy | The First O F S Pilot Home | 4 | G Marx/Dr F G van der Merwe Beech A36 |
|
| Stellalander Trophy | The First Cape Province Pilot Home | 77 | B Lipschitz/S Lipschitz Beech 58P |
|
| Comair Trophy | The Pilot of the First Cessna Home | 20 | H Steyn/A G Steyn Cessna C172 XP |
|
| Placo Trophy | The Pilot of the First Piper Home | 28 | C J B Proctor/A Campbell Piper PA28-180 |
|
| Beechcraft Trophy | The Pilot of the First Beechcraft Home | 49 | John Sayers/Chris Kyle Beech B55 |
|
| Carletonville Trophy | The Pilot of the First Baron Home | 49 | John Sayers/Chris Kyle Beech B55 |
|
| Southern Africa Mooney Trophy | The Pilot of the First Mooney Home | 39 | M Otto/J van Wyk Mooney M20 |
|
| Preller/Germishuys Trophy | Handicapping Committee Award | 1 | D C Dove/A W Dove Piper PA28-235 |
|
| Gastby Trophy | Best Handicap Performance on First Day | 20 | H Steyn/A G Steyn Cessna C172 XP |
|
| Stayer's Trophy | The Crew Continuing and Finishing Under Exceptional Conditions (Entered for 12 years in same aircraft) | 15 | ZS-FHA | Alan Hodgson/Cecil Hodgson Piper PA28-235 |
| Durban Wings Club Trophy | The First Durban Wings Club Pilot Home | 16 | N Tones/M L von Guilliaume Piper PA 28-140 |
|
| Chris Swart Krugersdorp Trophy | The First Krugersdorp Pilot Home | 49 | John Sayers/Chris Kyle Beech B55 |
|
| Lanseria Trophy | The First Lanseria based Pilot Home | 3 | J Errans/A Moolman Beech B58 |
|
| Commercial Aviation Trophy | The Pilot Giving the Best Performance | 6 | Aaron Searle/Morris Jackson Cessna Citation |
|
| Turbocharged Class | The First Turbocharged Aircraft | 77 | B Lipschitz/S Lipschitz Beech 58P |
|
| Turbine Class | The First Turboprop/Turbojet Aircraft | 7 | R Schwartz/A Potgieter/G Pretorius Lear 25d |
|
| Sportsmans Class | The First Team with Less Than 1000 hours | 20 | H Steyn/A G Steyn Cessna C172 XP |
|
| E A A Class | The First Experimental/Homebuilt Aircraft | 8 | D Loyally/D Hopkins Long Geezer |


A series of three articles written by Vic Kaiser prior to the 1988 Air Race
Due to the high level of competition that has developed over the past years, I feel it is time to give the less experienced competitors some guidelines and techniques to improve their performance in this race.
First and foremost is NAVIGATION. The shortest distance between two points is the straight line that joins them (correct for the distances covered in this event). Unless you fly the track represented by that line on your map you will he covering a longer distance and hence reducing your chances of gaining time. Now if you are on your desired track you should also have no problem in locating the turning point early and position yourself such that you can be seen and positively identified. Penalties must be awarded if you are not identified at a turning point.
Another factor to consider under navigation is the TERRAIN you cover. Study your route carefully on the preceding day and calculate the change in elevation of the terrain enroute. Depending on the excess power. climb performance, of your aircraft, decide then when and where to climb. Rather climb early and plan for a "cruise climb" where you decrease your speed by say 10 knots whilst climbing at 200 - 300 fpm rather than flying right up to the high ground and then executing a steep climb at a much lower speed.
Associated with terrain are UP/DOWN DRAUGHTS as well as WIND. When flying in an updraught don't try to maintain level flight but rather maintain your attitude and use the updraught to gain altitude which you can later trade for extra speed. Conversely, when encountering a downdraught fly down with the draught as far as possible changing your attitude gradually to avoid contact with the ground rather than an abrupt attitude change to maintain altitude. If however, you are very low, this obviously may not be possible.
While the above reasoning applies to crossing a ridge at say 90 degrees, when flying parallel to a ridge, you may choose to maintain a constant altitude and use the updraught to increase your speed.
Similarly expect updraughts on the windward side of the high ground and downdraughts on the leeward side and then apply the technique as discussed above. Bear in mind the manoeuvre limits of your aircraft when you encounter turbulence associated with the wind formations surrounding high ground.
Should the terrain be very flat and free from man-made obstructions and power lines AND you have the confidence and ability to do so you may elect to fly in "ground effect". When flying in ground effect, the cushion of air below you generates additional lift. Now if you were to keep your height constant and hence your lift, you will find that your true airspeed will increase slightly whilst maintaining a constant height above the ground. Just remember to trim slightly nose up when applying this technique. This technique, however, is not recommended whilst flying over undulating terrain, as you will be in this year's race.
However, ground effect is only effective up to a height of approximately 1/2 a wingspan. As you can see not only is it extremely difficult to fly at such a height, but additional problems with low level navigation are also encountered.
If you experience a tail wind cruise climb to gain altitude but remain in the tail wind as long as possible so as to maximise its effect.
Bear in mind however, if you climb too high you may he climbing "out of" a tailwind "into" a headwind segment and thereby cancel out any advantage given by the tailwind. Try to ascertain every few 100 feet whether you are gaining or losing in groundspeed before continuing. A good cue to look for lower down is to watch the ground features such as windmills, to determine the actual wind effect. The altitude gained, i.e. potential energy, can then be converted into a higher airspeed, kinetic energy. When approaching the turning point remembering that turn radius increases with an increase in speed. In order to minimise your radius of turn you will now have to increase your load factor, "g". Know your aircraft's structural limits as well as your own "g" capability and execute a minimum radius turn without "blacking-out" or high speed stalling whilst flying the track plotted on your map.
Also correlate the effect of a tail wind on your present leg to the next leg, as it may give you a headwind component on your next leg and thereby force you to alter your altitude. Similarly, when experiencing a headwind, change your altitude so as to minimise the negative component for the shortest time possible. Also ensure you are on track all the time whilst flying into a headwind, as any deviation will mean extra distance to be covered and hence a longer time spent in the headwind.
This article will be continued in next month's issue and we will take a look at other factors, such as drag, weight, C of G, trim as well as various other flying techniques. By analysing each of these effects on your performance we hope to improve your chances of winning this race.


A series of three articles written by Vic Kaiser prior to the 1988 Air Race
In last month's article we looked at Navigation, Terrain, Wind and Draughts associated with terrain. As promised we will look at a few more factors starting with DRAG.
We all know what drag is and how it affects our aircraft in general, but lets take a closer look at the various components of drag. We can divide TOTAL DRAG into two major components viz ZERO LIFT DRAG and LIFT DEPENDANT DRAG. Firstly lets analyse zero lift drag.
Zero lift drag can be further divided into 3 parts viz:
Surface friction drag, as the name implies, is dependant on the smoothness of your aircraft's skin. If you polish your aircraft well and remove any unnecessary "dents" in the leading edges of your aircraft, you will minimise surface friction drag as the whole surface area of the aircraft has a boundary layer, and thus causes surface friction drag. Form drag is a factor that really only the manufacturer can minimise in the design of the aircraft. Likewise the interference drag which, for instance is found where the wings meet the fuselage etc. As a competitor in this event, you are not allowed to "fill" the rivets of the fairings in order to reduce interference drag, as that renders your aircraft as non-standard.
Next we look at LIFT DEPENDANT DRAG which we categorise into:
As you remember from basic principles there exists a positive pressure below the wing and a negative pressure above the wing. Now the difference in pressure between upper and lower surfaces causes air to spill around the wing tips and to form vortices. The effect of these is to produce a downflow past the wing additional to that resulting from the production of lift. This additional downflow causes additional drag and is known as induced drag.
The factors affecting induced drag are:
Consider weight. The higher your weight the more lift required, at a given speed to support this weight. If you require more, lift, you require a greater pressure differential between upper and lower surfaces and hence a stronger vortex resulting in higher induced drag. Keep your aircraft weight to a minimum whilst making sure it remains standard.
Lastly we look at SPEED. At a given weight. lift remains constant during level flight. Should you now increase the speed in our lift formula
L=Cl .5 P V2 S
we can see that in order to keep LIFT constant we must reduce our Cl (angle of attack). Now from the previous discussion, when we do this, we decrease the pressure differential between upper and lower surfaces thereby decreasing the vortex as well as the induced drag. After all the purpose of this race is to fly as fast as possible, and if you do this with your minimum permissible weight. you will minimise your induced drag.
Next we will look at C of G position. If we have an aft C of G we need a "lifting" force in level flight. In order to get an upward moment from the tailplane our elevator will be deflected downwards slightly, the mean camber of the whole tail section now being the same as that of the wings. The tail section now produces additional lift and if we look back at our lift formula, we can see that with all other factors contact, the V2, being TAS, must increase.
However, small and insignificant these factors may seem, remember that if you gain 1 knot at a handicap speed of 150 knots, you should gain 52,45 seconds over an average course distance. Now if you can improve your performance by say 3 knots. you gain over the whole race is already 5 minutes over your fellow competitor, in a similar aircraft who has not prepared his aircraft to fly only 3 KNOTS faster.
And finally consider your engine and your propeller. Your propeller is like a rotating wing and exhibits the same properties as an aerofoil. So if you file out all the "nicks" and polish both sides of your propeller, without removing the paint as such, you can reduce your propeller drag and at least gain 1 of the 3 KNOTS you are looking for. Set your mixture at the correct setting for your power setting and remember that provided you keep the engine parameters below the red line, you should not damage your engine in the race. The final do's and don'ts will be continued in the next issue.


A series of three articles written by Vic Kaiser prior to the 1988 Air Race
As promised, here is the final of three articles to help you in this years' race.
In my first article I spoke about NAVIGATION and that the shortest distance between the turning points is the straight line that joins them. A lot of competitors remain within 500 m on either side of their desired track by zig-zagging from one feature to another to make good their plotted track. Although this is acceptable, it is not the shortest distance to get you to the turning point. Rather fly a CONSTANT HEADING towards a major feature further along your track and make small heading changes to adjust for drift than criss-crossing over your track several times. Remember every time you make a turn through more than 10 degrees you are slowing down your forward progress over the ground.
Now what happens when you MISS A TURNING POINT? The only way to avoid people from purposely turning short of a turning point and thereby flying a shorter distance and hence gaining incalculable time advantage, is to disqualify them from the race. Now should you inadvertently miss a turning point but wish to remain in the race, you must navigate back to the turning point and the extra time you take to do this, is the penalty you will loose for having missed the turning point in the first instance. So the sooner you turn back to the turning point, the less the time lost. However, remember there are other competitors on the same route and do not turn blindly in front of them.
Whilst on the subject of turning points I would like to remind you of the HEIGHT at which you should cross the turning point. The marshalls on the ground must visually, unassisted by binoculars, be able to read either your race numbers or aircraft registration. At 200 ft agl this is easily accomplished. If you are higher than this, it is possible misread either of the above and if you are lower than this the time period in which the marshall visually sights your aircraft is too short.
Next I will discuss the turning technique when approaching your turning point. It is always preferable to approach your turning point with excess height rather than at very low level. Firstly, positively identify the actual marshalling point at least 5NM out. Then look at your next leg and see what immediate feature there is on your next track. Locate this feature on the ground. Now lower your aircraft's nose and allow the speed to increase up to the yellow band on the ASI while still pointing directly at the turning point marshalls. Level off at approximately 200 ft agl and maintain this speed till within approximately 300 m from your turning point before applying approximately 60 degrees of bank and increasing your "g" loading to just off max "g" permissible. Ensure that you do not lose height, start looking for the ground feature you located on your next leg, and roll out on this feature. Give your DI/compass time to settle down and before realigning and proceeding on your next leg. Obviously these figures will vary with varying aircraft speed and must be adjusted accordingly.
Finally a few DONT'S for the race:
We look forward to seeing you all in Margate. Good luck!